When it comes to conventional weapons, although the U.S. We can see this in the hesitance to use weapons like nuclear missiles that not only have a deterrent influence on the potential target, but also on the potential user who must give thought to the human, political, and moral consequences of employing these or other types of weapon of mass destruction. Deterrence is a multi-directional factor. While the cost of use is important, we should give some thought to other potential consequences of weapons like LaWS - particularly when it comes to how the low cost of using the weapon might influence decision-making about how and when to use it. Of course, when this figure is mentioned, there is rarely an accompanying figure laying out what it cost to develop the weapon in the first place. That this has been widely touted as a positive aspect of the weapon is not surprising, since Americans seems to reside these days in a cultural milieu in which the bottom line is really the only thing that matters. When compared to shells or missiles, which can cost over $1 million per shot to fire, the LaWS weapon uses a mere $0.59 worth of energy per shot. Navy ships when they are faced with an invisible weapon that can destroy its targets at the speed of light.ДЄnother argument in favor of this weapon is that it significantly reduces cost of use. The political significance of LaWS lies, in part, in its potential deterrent effect - it may well be that potential enemies will think twice about approaching U.S. has taken an important technological step forward that should send a message to its enemies in addition to improving the defense of its ships.

NavyвЂ™s new laser weapon, known as LaWS, being deployed in the Persian Gulf, the U.S.

World at war campaign ray gun